Saturday, 6 December 2014

New British spanking censorship comes into force, or does it?

There I was, just starting to enjoy the springtime of my senility when any number of people started to write panic-stricken e-mails that all asked the same question: how will they be able to get their cock-throbbing, trouser-tightening, spanking porno videos now the government has put video downloads on a censorship par with DVDs? The answer to all of you is that you will, because nothing is going to happen that will effect you in any way, shape or form.

Let's start with your favourite DVDs, which you never had any trouble buying, did you? Have you ever wondered why you can send off your money to an accommodation address and get your video by return of post when it is all supposed to be illegal?

The reason for that is due to the fact that the police are no longer the people who deal with unlicensed videos. The last government handed that over to the councils to save money and the councils passed enforcement on to the only department they could think of which was trading standards. What this means is that a shop selling porno may get raided if a council is so minded, but an outfit selling through the post is pretty secure because trading standards are only responsible for their individual areas. They have no idea where the accommodation address that a video seller uses is actually located, and even if they have, so long as there are no actual disks on the premises then there is little that they can do. Most porn merchants keep their warehouses and offices in different parts of the country for just that reason, by the way.

Now then, even though as of this moment a download is covered by the same rules that govern a DVD sale, do you really think that anybody in the adult trade is going to use a British server to host their product? Firstly because most British hosts will not handle pornography, but mainly because the Americans and Germans have dedicated pornography hosting sites that are outside the jurisdiction of the UK government, never mind some small town council's trading standards department.

Companies such as Moonglow, the major producer of spanking videos in Britain are more concerned with American federal law then they are with British.

As for the smaller outfits that only have a few videos and cannot afford dedicated hosting, they will probably continue using Clips4Sale to punt their wares. Again, an American site, governed by American laws, with payments routed via American banks.

It kind of makes you wonder what is going on, doesn't it? Well, wonder no more, because this is fairly typical behaviour for a Tory government that is worried about losing the support of the anal retentives in their outer suburbs. This government is on the ropes with a support base that is going over to UKIP in vast numbers. They cannot give the suburban souls the immigration controls that they want, so are hoping that this nonsense will keep enough of them happy to allow Cameron to stagger back into Downing Street next May.

I have been around the trade for more years than I care to remember, as anyone who has read my memoirs will know, and I can tell you that nothing will happen at all that will prevent any of you getting the spanking videos that you enjoy so much.

Now let an old man go to bed...

Friday, 11 July 2014

Guest Posting: Early Janus Days

The following came as an e-mail from Leslie, and I reproduce it in full as a guest posting. If you have a good memory to share with us, then please sent it to

Not sure why I have come late to your blog but maybe I am blinded by the sheer volume of material on the t'internet. Not all good it has to be said.

 However your blog has lightened my day by reminding me that there are people out there who remember the days when our appetite was only fed monthly by way of carefully purchased magazines from a quiet backstreet newsagent!

Your historical input, though aimed at informing the youngsters (under 50!)....has given me a good smile or two.

Being a little older than yourself, I have been 'at it' since about 1969 and can put some further detail to the pre-Janus (as many know it) days. Things started off in about '72 with an A6 photo booklet called "Search" which catered for three distinct fetishes, Rubber, Leather and CP.

 A spin off in the same format called "Mentor" appeared which as you indicated only ran for a few issues, still covering the three fetish topics and running in parallel with "Search". This was still being produced in the A6 format before the name changed over to "Janus" again still in the small format. Soon Janus produced three "specials" in the summer of '73 which catered for the three fetish main interests, however the spanking edition outsold the other two several times over. Thereafter Janus was about one single topic and one topic only.

In 1974 Janus introduced a larger format (the same size as the three specials) for the magazine approx A5 or just a little larger. It's content was a mixture of photo's, stories and most importantly the "readers letters" section which I believe fascinated an entire generation of readers, in fact it drew in those who had seen those spanking letters to Penthouse magazine back in 1967. A further three spanking specials were produced, bringing the reader additional and perhaps a more highly tuned version of the monthly output. In the late 70's the format was changed to the final A4 style which remained until its recent demise. All copies were identified by Volume and Number, until a re-vamp saw the system re-start at Number One. Until that point I was the owner of every single copy of these magazines that had been produced, as a personal collection, including all the "specials". At this time I had split somewhat acrimoniously from my long time girlfriend, a well spanked and caned girlfriend she had been too. I was threatened with being "outed" and so to protect my professional life I somewhat mistakenly parted company with this collection, for next to nothing (no E-bay in those days).

 Once things had settled, I recommenced my collection starting with the larger format versions which were re-numbered to start at "One". I still have all these magazines, together with the notable additions of "Roue" and "Blushes" and their spin-offs. I noted your views about how the printed article finally gave way to the internet but there was also a secondary element.

We started to see the the world change, whereby some fetishes were being squeezed by the onset of the sort of the sort of sexual fascism that is present today. The written content was changed to reflect only the consensual and to all but eliminate any reference to childhood or youth. One look at a 1970's Janus would have many of today's twittering classes go running for the hills! The changes started to make the magazines look sanitised and bland just like the US influenced 70's mags like Corporal and Sting (later to be a sister product to Janus for a while). However, much of the content of the earlier magazines is unlikely to be found due to the moving conveyor belt of acceptability, as we all swerve down the route of officially trashing the 20th Century and all it gave us, having fought long legal battles to overcome censorship. (God help DLT). I wonder how much will end up in the "secret" section of the British Library... Perhaps all of the Janus "members only" paper pamphlets produced in the '80s along with the Eric Wildman pamphlets from the early fifties.

Your blog has indicated where some of the earlier material can now be found, scanned in, for internet users to view. Although "Uncle Peter's" site seems to have vanished, some Blushes stories can be found under Mr Whacker.

Please feel free to cut and paste any of this information and comment to your blog. Time passes very quickly and one wonders just what I am to do with my large quantity of printed material from times gone by! Regards Leslie

Tuesday, 10 June 2014

Authentic Punishment Photos: Wendy's Response

 Yesterday I posted this rather delightful shot of a freshly caned rump which belongs to a certain 35 year old named Wendy. David, her husband and the man responsible for welting that naughty bottom sent the photo in, and I dropped him a line to ask if Wendy might be prevailed upon to give us her views on the matter.

Sure enough, here is her mail, reproduced in full:

Hello Sir,

 I have been instructed to write to you, hence this email. I refused initially but I was caned again. He showed me the post on your blog from Janice and the other ladies and he told me I got off lightly compared to the photo of the other lady's caned bottom. However, it seems that I can expect my future spankings to be more disciplinary punishment than the fun spankings which I have been used to.

When we got married he showed me the cane, he said he had caned his ex and told me that If I got out of hand he would use it on me. He did spank me a few times after arguments, he spanked quite hard, and I found it humiliating to be put over his knee and have my skirt raised or jeans pulled down, followed by knickers and then to be spanked like a naughty girl, this was completely different to what I call the fun spankings which were erotic. I was sure that the cane was just for show and that he probably had never used it before. Although I got a few playful strokes when dressed as a schoolgirl for a bit of marital fun, I thought he would never use it for punishment. Last week I learned he was not bluffing.

 I know I am waffling a bit here I am sorry if it doesn’t flow very well. I run my own successful business, separate from what my husband does, I founded and expanded the business and I am regarded as no pushover by those I employ and the companies I deal with. If you looked at us as a couple from the outside, I'm guessing most people would assume I am a bossy wife as well. So to be humiliated and punished is something that I dread anyone knowing about.

 It was horrifying to see a picture of my bare bottom on your blog, it’s bad enough that I was caned on my bare bottom, it was painful and humiliating to have to bend over and stay in position for each stroke, without the added humiliation of knowing anyone can see it. It was worse still that I had to look at it on my own PC in my office at work today, and I was told to leave the page and not close it down, I was at least permitted to have another page open so I could flick off it if someone came in my office. If anyone I do business with or any of my employees were to see my caned bum I cannot imagine it.

 Please don’t post this bit on-line - Please take the picture down. I know I deserved the cane and I accepted my discipline. I don’t know what I can do to convince you to take it down. I have been humiliated enough, I’m begging you to remove the picture.


You have to admire the pleading at the end, don't you? Alas for poor Wendy, this blog believes in maximum humiliation for recalcitrant females, so not only is the photo staying live, I have posted it again today.

 If you have a photo of a freshly disciplined female and you feel that it would be good for her soul to have it presented here then please send it along to:

Monday, 9 June 2014

Authentic Punishment Photos: Wendy

Meet Wendy, who is a 35 year old businesswoman. More importantly, meet her bare bottom that had just received its first ever caning on the evening of Friday, the 30th May 2014.

Her husband, David, sent us the photo, and a couple of days later he followed up with this short message, just to set the scene: 

We are married and I introduced her to playful spankings prior to our wedding, after I warned her that I would spank her for punishment, if required. 

She is 35 years old and runs her own business, I can't say what it is for obvious reasons, but she employs 30 people and at work is a very demanding boss. She takes no messing at work but at home the tables are turned, and now I have explained that she cannot speak to me like she does to her employees or she will get caned again. I went a little easy as it was her first time with the cane although I gave it to her with no warm up as you can see. 

She is aware the photo will be put on line and is mortified at the thought. I have warned her that I may well post more photos in future and that now her behaviour has led to a caning I will be introducing her to more implements in future. 

Please let me know when it is due to go on-line, and I will pop into her office and show her on her work PC. Believe me, she will hate that. 

David, what can I say? That is what I call damned fine marksmanship, and I would be willing to bet that Wendy was a very good girl for several days afterwards, especially when she tried to sit down!

Please drop me a line and let me know how Wendy reacted to the news that a photo of her bare, freshly caned buttocks are all over the web. It's not just my blog, but you need to think about the Facebook crowd as well, because I will link to the post via that. Just think, one of the people who works for her could quite easily see the photo through a Facebook link. 

Well, look on the bright side - it should teach her to behave.

 If you have a photo of a freshly disciplined female and you feel that it would be good for her soul to have it presented here then please send it along to

Tuesday, 27 May 2014

Order of the Burning Buttocks: Princess Kate, for showing her bare bottom again!

She's done it again! I refuse to believe that this upskirt shot is yet another accident - the saucy mare is an exhibitionist of note. Last week Princess Kate went out yet again without any knickers on and yet again a gust of wind blew her flimsy skirt up to reveal a very bare and incredibly shapely bottom for the world to see.

Last year in Australia she did the same thing as you can see on the left. A flimsy dress, a gust of wind, a bare bottom displayed for the delight of all and sundry.

Once is an accident, but twice is the mark of a cheeky miss who enjoys giving hard ons to red blooded men everywhere.

What this chit needs is a damned fine over the knee spanking, with her skirts raised not by the wind but by Prince Billy's hand, just before he brings it down again and again on that cheeky posterior.

Prince Billy: England demands that you do your duty!

Monday, 28 April 2014

Is Nigel Farage dominant or submissive?

With the European elections now less than a month away the question on everyone's lips concerns UKIP leader Nigel Farage: is he a dominant or a submissive? Well, maybe not on everyone's lips, but certainly on mine, as I keep my ear to the ground about these things and the allegations about Nigel's proclivities are circulating more and more.

One of the best sources around for UKIP scandal is Junius, and he reports that Farage is a submissive and quotes unnamed former lovers of the man to back that up. That said, people who have actually met Annabelle Fuller, who is reputed to be a former Farage squeeze, report that aside from having a really rather nice pair of melons, she is also small, sweet and does not match the profile of a dominatrix.

Certainly, at 5' 6" if that, Farage does not come over as particularly dominant; quite the reverse in fact. He is also an old public schoolboy so one can imagine him being put over matron's knee to have his naughty botty-wotty smacked back in the day and learning that he quite liked it. Given his lack of inches he could probably still fit into his old school uniform come to think of it, so the idea of naughty Nigel does have a certain ring to it.

On the other hand, Junius reports that Farage may enjoy sending his mistresses off to be ridden by other men, and I fully understand the attraction of that since it is a pastime of mine as well. Especially if the other fellow is a disciplinarian as it means that I can wander off and have a damned fine lunch and for desert I get to admire a fine set of welts and can sit back to hear the tale of how they were created in its entirety. Yes, I know, I really have taken indolence to a truly  high level, haven't I?

If I was a gambling man, I would bet on Farage as a traditional, authoritative horseman who knows how to keep his fillies in line, but who is relaxed enough to lend them out to other riders for a canter around the park from time to time.

Friday, 25 April 2014

Authentic Punishment Photos: Janice (2)

Just over a week ago I ran this photo of Janice that was taken shortly after her husband had finished correcting her in the traditional way. As you can see her buttocks are red and swollen, and it should have been obvious to all that even in spite of her 60+ years, Janice knows who wears the trousers in her family.

Now she has written to us setting out exactly how she feels about the photo of her bare bottom being seen by thousands of people

My husband made me look at the Memories blog on Tuesday and I just couldn't believe my eyes. Straightaway of course I knew that it was a photo of my bottom and not just my bottom but my reddened bottom. To say that I was mortified is putting it mildly. I'm a professional woman with over thirty women working in my team and I can't imagine what they would think if they got any inkling of the fact that there is a picture of my bare bottom on the web!

My husband told me that I should do what is suggested at the end of the post and drop you a line about my feelings. I flatly refused to do that both on Tuesday and yesterday in spite of the fact that last night just before I got into bed he bent me over his knee, pulled my pjs down and warmed my behind. The only reason I'm writing now is because he's threatened to send other photos to be displayed.

How do I feel? Well of course I feel embarrassed and humiliated but my overwhelming feeling is one of shame: shame that my bare bottom is on display, shame that my bottom has obviously been chastised, shame that I am still being spanked at my age, shame that the world and his wife can see what my husband has done to my bottom. In fact it's as though I've been bared, spanked and then made to stand with my bottom facing  a patio window which is alongside a busy street or, even worse, made to stand outside the front door of a house in the middle of a busy town or city with hundreds of shoppers, commuters etc passing by.

My final shame, or is this pride, is that because the photo was taken at close range my bum looks humongous and it really, really isn't. I'm sending a photo taken outside last summer and I think it shows that for a woman of my age my bum is of a reasonable size. 
What can we say? Thank you, Janice, for the delightful e-mail!
If you have a photo of a freshly disciplined female and you feel that it would be good for her soul to have it presented here then please send it along to
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...